Comments on: Why Antigua & Barbuda may never join ECTEL https://ict-pulse.com/2012/04/why-antigua-barbuda-may-never-join-ectel/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-antigua-barbuda-may-never-join-ectel&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-antigua-barbuda-may-never-join-ectel Discussing ICT, telecommunications and technology Issues from a Caribbean perspective Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 By: mmarius https://ict-pulse.com/2012/04/why-antigua-barbuda-may-never-join-ectel/#comment-2953 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:00:47 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=3679#comment-2953 In reply to Rodney.

Rodney, I am more inclined to think that suggestion might be “a tad” too politically ambitious. ECTEL has worked so far because, to varying degrees, the participating countries have been prepared to cede some of their sovereignty (and revenue) to make it work, and thanks to the OECS framework and successes, there would have been some precedence for that approach.

If the grouping was expanded, one may likely find that many of the (newer) countries might not want to follow the recommendations made – which currently they would be required to – and the entire machinery would most likely devolve into one where ECTEL becomes a research/advisory centre to inform decisions made by the individual countries (which is a void I think the CTU should be filling), rather that the unifying force that it currently is…

]]>
By: Rodney https://ict-pulse.com/2012/04/why-antigua-barbuda-may-never-join-ectel/#comment-2941 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:36:22 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=3679#comment-2941 I think a case can be made for non-OECS countries to join ECTEL, perhaps re-branded without the “E”. It’s a very efficient model and it has been beneficial to the member countries involved. Some of the other Caribbean countries, such as Barbados and Jamaica for example, don’t have the ‘impediments’ that you have outlined for Antigua. Competition is dynamic and the state does not have a vested interest. Is this too politically ambitious?

]]>