Comments on: The brewing Internet Governance storm… and why you should care https://ict-pulse.com/2012/09/brewing-internet-governance-storm-care/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=brewing-internet-governance-storm-care&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=brewing-internet-governance-storm-care Discussing ICT, telecommunications and technology Issues from a Caribbean perspective Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:16:30 +0000 hourly 1 By: Trinidad & Tobago: Internet Governance Issues · Global Voices https://ict-pulse.com/2012/09/brewing-internet-governance-storm-care/#comment-10674 Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:16:30 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=4624#comment-10674 […] Pulse lays out a few key points about Internet governance and explains why you should care; a follow-up post identifies three […]

]]>
By: Bevil Wooding https://ict-pulse.com/2012/09/brewing-internet-governance-storm-care/#comment-10538 Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:11:38 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=4624#comment-10538 Well stated Carlton.

Meaningful participation in international fora does indeed come at a hefty price in terms of human time as well as financial costs. However, the cost of disengagement, apathy and ignorance can be even higher for Caribbean society. When one considers what is ultimately at stake, the individual sacrifice is well worth the collective gain.

Still, the press for greater Caribbean involvement in shaping the future of the Internet can only benefit from wider awareness, appreciation and understanding of the complex issues – at the institutional as well as individual level.

This puts a double responsibility upon persons already involved to represent internationally, whilst reaching out and educating regionally. It’s the safest way to protect our common dwellings from the brewing global storm.

We soldier on.

]]>
By: Carlton Samuels https://ict-pulse.com/2012/09/brewing-internet-governance-storm-care/#comment-10516 Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:14:17 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=4624#comment-10516 Thanks Bevil. Yessir, I could not have explained the situation better! For transparency, let the record show that I was nominated and now serve as Vice-Chair on ICANN’s At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC). The major deficiency in the region is inattention to issues and to the work of the institutions. And the issues are complex and require significant investment of time and knowledge to effectively participate. We need new blood and greater support.

The key attribute is that participation in policy development in almost all of these institutions is voluntary; meaning you do not get paid for as much as 15 hours of time commitment in a week, usually in virtual meetings and studying complex policy proposals with their voluminous supporting documentation. That aside, too few of us from the region are engaged. And too few of us are in the room when decisions that impact all of us are made. For those of us now engaged, we’re thinly spread and approaching burnout.

Policy development in ICANN is a multi-stakeholder affair. And at every level, civil society, business and government, the region is disadvantaged. There are businesses – not just those in the Internet ecosystem – with paid staff members whose sole responsibility is to follow and influence internet policy development. The situation is the same with certain governments, particularly OECD and BRIC members. Some institutions, like ICANN, offer competitive fellowships and bursaries for interested individuals to attend and participate in meetings. And in the past few years a few persons from the region have been supported that way. But we are yet to see a critical mass develop from that initiative.

We soldier on.

]]>