Comments on: When governments decide to back out of agreements they made, is it fair to cry foul? https://ict-pulse.com/2018/08/governments-decide-agreements-made-fair-cry-foul/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=governments-decide-agreements-made-fair-cry-foul&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=governments-decide-agreements-made-fair-cry-foul Discussing ICT, telecommunications and technology Issues from a Caribbean perspective Sat, 25 Aug 2018 12:09:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kamutula https://ict-pulse.com/2018/08/governments-decide-agreements-made-fair-cry-foul/#comment-172228 Sat, 25 Aug 2018 12:09:09 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=136449#comment-172228 Clearly anti-business.

I am not privy to the specific details of the agreement. However, if circumstances had changed or govt realised the agreement was no longer realistically tenable, a better approach was to establish dialogue with the other parties.

]]> By: Carlton SAMUELS https://ict-pulse.com/2018/08/governments-decide-agreements-made-fair-cry-foul/#comment-172224 Fri, 03 Aug 2018 16:41:17 +0000 http://www.ict-pulse.com/?p=136449#comment-172224 This development brings all the worries you outlined for sure. Before I make up my mind, I would want to know the situation with APUA, the other provider in the market and especially that it is state-owned. All that aside, whether an act of rebalancing or tipping the scale to one side, the action roils the environment and will always be reported internationally as an anti-business move.

]]>