{"id":127823,"date":"2018-04-06T06:45:02","date_gmt":"2018-04-06T11:45:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ict-pulse.com\/?p=127823"},"modified":"2018-04-06T07:39:29","modified_gmt":"2018-04-06T12:39:29","slug":"naivete-greed-essential-innovation-success-technology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ict-pulse.com\/2018\/04\/naivete-greed-essential-innovation-success-technology\/","title":{"rendered":"Are naivet\u00e9 and greed essential for innovation and success in technology?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Over the past few weeks, Facebook has been under intense scrutiny for allegedly weak privacy and data protection measures. But has the company\u2019s behaviour and actions been motivated by greed, naivet\u00e9, or a combination of the two?<\/em><\/p>\n If you have been following the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica saga, you would have realised that to some degree, the focus has shifted considerably from Cambridge Analytica to Facebook. The situation continues to unfold, and as was stated in a recent article, it is likely to get worse before it gets better<\/a>, as governments worldwide have been questioning whether Facebook has had too much autonomy, and whether more controls should be introduced.<\/p>\n The furore has caused me to revisit Facebook\u2019s attitude and posture over the years, along with that of other tech businesses. I am thus of the view that the seeds of the current situation were sown years ago, when Facebook was a fledging operation trying to figure out how to leverage its product into the powerhouse business it has become.<\/p>\n Although there were social networks before Facebook, and social networks after Facebook, none of them are as popular as Facebook, with over 2.1 billion monthly active users at the end of 2017 (Source: Facebook<\/a>), and still growing! However, although the company has been a highly popular, for years it suffered with not being profitable. More specifically, it was not able to capitalize on its popularity \u2013 with both individuals and businesses \u2013 to generate revenue commensurate with the value it provided.<\/p>\n Having said this, it could be argued that Facebook was the poster child for a popular business model in the tech space: give away your product for free in the first instance, in order to build your customer base, and thereafter figure out how to leverage it become profitable. However, Facebook struggled with the second part of the formula, but have since figured out how to use its platform, along with all of the data it has on its customers to attract significant advertising revenue.<\/p>\nThe struggle to be profitable<\/h3>\n
The pressure of public shareholders<\/h3>\n