{"id":156372,"date":"2021-02-19T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-02-19T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ict-pulse.com\/?p=156372"},"modified":"2021-02-19T18:39:16","modified_gmt":"2021-02-19T23:39:16","slug":"4-crucial-questions-on-the-security-failure-of-jamaicas-covid-19-website","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ict-pulse.com\/2021\/02\/4-crucial-questions-on-the-security-failure-of-jamaicas-covid-19-website\/","title":{"rendered":"4 crucial questions on the security failure of Jamaica\u2019s COVID-19 website"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
This week, news came to light that the website and application that the Government of Jamaica has been using to manage the immigration records and COVID-19 test results of residents and visitors to the island, had been severely compromised. Although the security failure has been remedied, several questions still linger.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The Jamaican tech and business communities have been in an uproar over the past few days, following the publication of an article by TechCrunch<\/a>, on 17 February which reported that the data for thousands of travellers to Jamaica has been exposed on the country\u2019s immigration site. The report, which seemed to have been based on first-hand investigations conducted by TechCrunch, found that documents and data uploaded to the country\u2019s JamCOVID19 website<\/a> and app and stored in the cloud, \u201cwas left unprotected and without a password, and was publicly spilling out files onto the open web<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The article further noted that the storage server, which is hosted on Amazon Web Services and at the time, had its access privileges set so that anyone with Internet connectivity could access the stored records, contained the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The JamCOVID19 website and app was built for the Government by Amber Group<\/a>, a company that has been growing in popularity, thanks to Amber Connect, its vehicle-tracking system, and building a widely-used bill payment app for the incumbent electricity provider. More recently, it launched the Amber HEART Academy, a new school for coding, which garnered much political praise (Source: Loop Jamaica<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the Jamaica Information Service (JIS)<\/a>, the breach was discovered on 16 February, and the \u201cvulnerability was immediately rectified upon discovery\u201d. Further, \u201cthere is no evidence to suggest that the security vulnerability had been exploited for malicious data extraction prior to it being rectified<\/em>\u201d. However, it should be noted \u2013 albeit for the first statement \u2013 that TechCrunch is saying something different. According to Zack Whittaker, Security Editor at TechCrunch, it had contacted the Ministry of Health in Jamaica on Saturday, 13 February, supplied details on the details of the exposed server on Sunday, and nothing happened. However, it was only when TechCrunch was able to identify the contractor, Amber Group, and contacted them directly on 16 February that the server was secured (Source: Twitter<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Without a doubt, and even at the best of times, with the most robust security available, breaches and incidents can occur. However, what makes the situation particularly damaging is the fact that server security was not activated, which is tantamount to leaving one\u2019s front door wide open. No nefarious intrusion tricks needed to be used, and for all intents and purposes, the data on the server could be accessed at will.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Having said this, it may be still early days in this saga. However, considering the sheer magnitude of the situation, below are some early thoughts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n From the information available in the public domain, Amber Group is a software development company that tends to build its own products, and reportedly has operations in 23 countries. However, it could be argued that in being an experienced IT company, that works for governments and manages sensitive information for and on behalf of its clients, the security omission is beyond a \u2018rookie mistake\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Under the circumstances, it does not appear that any security-related checks and balances were in place, which would be monitored on a regular basis. Further, and even with regard to procedures when commissioning an application or platform, they may not be sufficiently comprehensive or robust. In other word, Amber Group may be an IT company that does not fully appreciate the need for, and importance of, security, evidenced by the fact that this glaring omission was active for nine months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Although the Amber Group might be the contractor, and so is likely to be the main party answerable for the security failure that occurred, questions may also need to be asked of the Government of Jamaica as it relates to its posture on security, and correspondingly the policies and frameworks it has in place. The Government is the repository of considerable volumes of personal data of individuals, along with confidential and commercially sensitive information on businesses and organisations. Hence three questions that merit consideration include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the JIS article cited above, the Government was reported to give assurances that it takes \u201cdata privacy and security extremely seriously and remain committed to stringent security protocols in keeping with local and international standards<\/em>\u201d. However, and under the current circumstances, what does that mean? The response to date by the Government of Jamaica is inadequate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n In 2020, Jamaica successfully enacted its Data Protection Act, which was subject to extensive debate and review prior to its promulgation. At the time of writing, the full provisions of the Act are not yet effective, as a transition period has been established to facilitate public awareness, and for organisations to take the steps needed to ensure full compliance with the legislation. Notwithstanding, the personal data of individuals \u2013 tourists and Jamaicans<\/strong> \u2013 was not protected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, and perhaps a bigger issue potentially, is the implications of such a breach on the international stage, such as with regard to the European Union\u2019s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). As noted in our Podcast episode with attorney-at-law, and data protection specialist, Bartlett Morgan<\/a>, the GDPR has been designed to have extraterritorial reach. Hence, just one national of the European Union (EU), whose personal data was compromised, may have grounds under GDPR to initiate action against the Government of Jamaica.<\/p>\n\n\n\n1. How serious is Amber Group about security?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
2. How serious is the Government of Jamaica about security?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
3. Is the Government ready for the privacy implications?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n