{"id":158519,"date":"2021-05-21T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-21T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ict-pulse.com\/?p=158519"},"modified":"2021-05-20T18:04:22","modified_gmt":"2021-05-20T23:04:22","slug":"the-politics-of-universal-service-funds-and-the-widening-digital-divide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ict-pulse.com\/2021\/05\/the-politics-of-universal-service-funds-and-the-widening-digital-divide\/","title":{"rendered":"The politics of Universal Service Funds and the widening digital divide"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
These days, Universal Access and\/or Service Funds are increasingly being used in ways outside of their initial purpose, which it could be argued is widening the digital divide.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n In the early days of telecoms regulation, the sometimes prohibitive cost of building out networks, particularly to small communities where the deployment costs were unlikely to ever be recovered, was widely acknowledged as a deficiency that would need to be addressed in order to ensure that all citizens had access to telecoms services. It is with this in mind that concepts, such as Universal Access and Universal Service emerged, as a means of supporting the continued expansion of telecoms networks when it might be uneconomical to do so. As a result, a global best practice is the establishment of a Universal Access and\/or Service Fund (UASF), which has been implemented in many Caribbean countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, although the initial and still-existing premise for UASFs in many Caribbean countries was infrastructure-related \u2013 to connect the unconnected \u2013 there has been a growing departure from that construct. As a result, it could be argued that the way UASFs are now being used may have far-reaching consequences for the state of telecoms and the internet into the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Thanks to the emphasis on mobile\/cellular communications across the region, for which comprehensive networks already exist and take-up is high, a case could be made that Caribbean countries already have (almost) countrywide network coverage. Universal Access and Universal Service have thus been achieved, obviating the need for further infrastructure expansion. However, and noting that UASFs were still being collected, in some quarters, policymakers started to make a case for \u2018infrastructure-adjacent\u2019, or \u2018other value-added\u2019 activities, which may not necessarily be strictly defined, to be financed with UASFs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some of the infrastructure-adjacent activities that were implemented included addressing key barriers to access on the consumer side, such as access to suitable devices. To that end, UASFs in the many Caribbean countries have been used to support tablet computers in schools programmes, which gained considerable prominence last year, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the shift to remote and digital learning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Although mobile\/cellular coverage is nearly ubiquitous in most Caribbean countries, the pandemic revealed some gaps in the robustness of the wired and wireless networks. Three key gaps were, when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n In some countries, traffic on Internet networks increased by 60%, as more people had no choice but to use the Internet to conduct business online, for entertainment, and everything in between, which resulted in gaps (i) and (ii). However, gap (iii) highlighted the limited nature of the mobile\/cellular infrastructure, which though nearly universal and perhaps preferred for personal use, was not suitable for work, and when high-bandwidth connectivity was required for eight-plus hours a day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Although the regional telcos, in particular, have offering WiMax-based services that leverage their existing mobile\/cellular infrastructure, generally, coverage was spotty, and the connectivity inconsistent. With the pandemic and the upsurge in traffic, the quality of that service would also have been affected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As can be expected, consumer complaints ensued, and telcos had to urgently respond, although their business was also being adversely affected by, for example, the collapse of the hotel industry in the region. Nevertheless, mobile\/cellular networks were upgraded to LTE (Long Term Evolution) technology and were expanded with the installation of more cell sites. However, and with regard to the latter, and in the majority of instances, UASFs were not used for those network expansion activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Typically, the UASFs in Caribbean countries are funded in two ways, either as a tax levied directly on consumers based on their consumption of certain services, such as in Jamaica, or as a fee payable by the telcos, calculated as a percentage of revenue, which is the approach used in many Eastern Caribbean countries. It therefore means that UASFs tend to have a revenue stream, although in many countries, the amount being paid in has been declining, as consumers have switched over to the internet for a broad range of activities. Having said this, the process to access the UASFs can be protracted, and with perception that infrastructure-related projects were no longer a priority, it would appear that UASFs were growing without a purpose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is in light of the above that to varying degrees, politics has become evident. Policymakers want to be seen as \u2018making a difference\u2019 in their communities, and UASF administrators did not seem to be able to identify projects, based on the initial construct for those funding mechanisms. The emphasis thus shifted to other \u2018value-added\u2019 activities, such as computing device purchase or subsidies, procuring and installing infrastructure in community centres and schools, and even paying the bills for school and community centre internet connectivity, which are now being channelled to UASFs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As it currently stands, many of our countries are highly indebted, and so outside of servicing loans, paying salaries and other key recurrent expenses, Governments may not readily have the means to directly finance the above-mentioned \u2018value-added\u2019 activities. Hence, it could be argued that UASFs are being seen as an extension of the Consolidated Fund, or as a means for Government being able to implement telecoms-associated activities that it would otherwise struggle to implement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n It must be emphasised that although implementation of \u2018value-added activities\u2019 might be necessary \u2013 as they are gaps or deficiencies that need to be addressed \u2013 the question of whether UASFs should be used to finance them still persists. The three activities mentioned, device purchase\/subsidy, community centre and school outfitting, school\/community centre bill payment, tend to be focussed on people or situations that cannot afford them. However, frequently, little or no consideration is being given to the following issues, which ultimately, exacerbate the digital divide:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Once again, COVID-19 highlighted some of the challenges that were being experienced across the region:<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Into the future, most Caribbean countries are eager for 5G technology to be rolled out, but most of the telcos have indicated that there is no immediate or imminent intention to do so. Further, the regional telcos in particular have been advocating for more public-private investment in the infrastructure, and for Over The Top service providers to be charged for access to their networks. Although it is uncertain whether these issues will be resolved in the telcos\u2019 favour, how UASFs are and should be used in the future may need to be revisited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As much as UASFs in Caribbean countries have an income stream, the amounts received are finite. Further, big infrastructure-related projects are expensive \u2013 and may even require multiyear accumulation of funds in order to pay for them. On the flipside, there are consumer-related needs that Governments need to address, in order for citizens to be able to meaningfully participate in the digital societies and economies that are emerging. The use of UASFs ought not be frivolous, capricious or primarily with politics in mind. Instead, they should be employed to have a longer-term and meaningful impact in reducing the digital divide, as we continue to advance to digital societies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n\u2018Infrastructure-adjacent\u2019 activities<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Holes in networks<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The politics of UASFs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The widening digital divide<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
5G and the future<\/h2>\n\n\n\n