{"id":168448,"date":"2023-05-26T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-05-26T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ict-pulse.com\/?p=168448"},"modified":"2023-05-26T20:05:19","modified_gmt":"2023-05-27T01:05:19","slug":"3-questions-we-need-to-ask-about-the-recently-signed-port-of-spain-commitment-on-digital-integration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ict-pulse.com\/2023\/05\/3-questions-we-need-to-ask-about-the-recently-signed-port-of-spain-commitment-on-digital-integration\/","title":{"rendered":"3 questions we need to ask about the recently signed Port of Spain Commitment on Digital Integration"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The Port of Spain Commitment on Digital Integration was recently made by Caribbean countries, which was seen as a demonstration of the importance countries are placing on digital transformation and the need for greater regional integration. In this article, we discuss the implications and potential impact of this agreement. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n During the week of May 15, Executive Sessions on Digital Leadership in the Caribbean were held in Trinidad and Tobago, which culminated in the signing of the Port of Spain Commitment on Digital Integration<\/em>. The event was hosted by the Ministry of Digital Transformation of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, in collaboration with the Inter- American Development Bank (IDB) and the Caribbean Telecommunications Union (CTU), and sought to create a space in which the region\u2019s most senior digital transformation policymakers could discuss and share information on their digital transformation efforts in their respective home countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n From all accounts, the event was well-received by attendees and at the end of the sessions, the policymakers, who represented 11 Caribbean countries, made the following commitments towards digital integration:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The countries represented in the Commitment were Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Cura\u00e7ao, Dominica, Grenada, Haiti, Suriname, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago. This article offers a brief examination of the Port of Spain Commitment on Digital Integration<\/em>, specifically, what may happen next now that the pledges have been made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The likely impact of this Commitment is not clear, as no indication of the next steps has been shared. Each of the individual commitments is important, and their successful realisation could meaningfully advance regional digital integration. However, the commitments themselves are high-level. Each would require more intensive discourse to identify, among other things, objectives, strategies, critical milestones and agreed timelines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, and since the full text of the Commitment has not been made publicly available, it is unclear whether outside of the individual pledges whether the document included any effective period, or time frame in which the commitments should be achieved. Hence, pending the release of information to the contrary, the Port of Spain Commitment on Digital Integration<\/em> may end up being a \u2018feel-good\u2019 document that has no teeth or momentum to accelerate the digital transformation and regional digital integration efforts across the Caribbean region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The short answer may be, yes\u2026 sort of. The CARICOM Single ICT Space is supposed to be the digital layer upon which the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME) will be realised. Hence, essential to the CARICOM Single ICT Space would be the harmonisation of digital frameworks among CARICOM countries to allow for deeper digital integration and seamless cross-border transactions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The pledges made under the Port of Spain Commitment on Digital Integration <\/em>appear to foster the CARICOM Single ICT Space and CSME, but are not all of the areas that would need to be addressed, such as harmonising the ICT policy, legal and regulatory regimes and ensuring that the national and regional broadband infrastructure is robust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, it must be highlighted that not all CARICOM countries (its 15 Full Members and five Associate Members) participated in the Commitment, and not all of the participants are CARICOM countries \u2013 the exception being Cura\u00e7ao. Hence, it could be argued that this Commitment is diverting attention from the Single ICT Space, which still has not realised meaningful progress, though it was conceptualised over a decade ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n At the time of writing, the next steps are unclear, as they have not been made publicly available. As previously stated, the individual commitments are broad and would need to be fleshed out. Thereafter, if the countries are serious about their pledges, they would need to be prepared to do what is necessary to achieve the goals outlined in each of the pledges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Unfortunately, Caribbean countries generally have a poor track record of following through on regional commitments. Typically, there are reports that countries have agreed to a particular course of action, but thereafter, nothing happens, which has resulted in some degree of cynicism and scepticism when regional pronouncements are made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\n
What is the potential impact of this Commitment?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Isn\u2019t it duplicating the CARICOM Single ICT Space initiative?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
What is next?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n