With AI becoming an increasingly important force in business and the wider society, could we be overloading on AI? Are there situations in which AI is not the answer? Where should we draw the line?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force in business that has been reshaping how companies operate, interact with customers, and manage resources. While its adoption brings significant advantages, it also presents challenges that need careful consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Over the past several months, business leaders have been excited about AI\u2019s potential in the workplace. Without a doubt, there are several often repeated benefits of using AI, including the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, some concerns have recently been raised about whether organisations might be going overboard with how they are using or intend to use AI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Last month, the National Tourist Board of Germany launched an AI travel influencer, called Emma<\/a>, to help promote the country. In having Emma on the team, who by the way has an Instagram account<\/a>, the Tourist Board would have a travel ambassador that would be available 24\/7, have access to a huge reserve of facts and data, and would be cheaper than human travel influencers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Spines, an online book publishing platform, recently announced that in 2025, it plans to publish up to 8,000 books next year using AI. The company intends to charge authors between USD 1,200 and USD 5,000 \u201cto have their books edited, proofread, formatted, designed and distributed with the help of AI<\/em>\u201d (Source: The Guardian<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These two scenarios are just a few of the ways AI is being used to potentially disrupt traditional industries \u2013 though the full results are yet to be seen. Nevertheless, AI and, by extension technology, are making some significant inroads into areas that perhaps had been considered human-centric and human-driven. For example, Emma might need some work to ensure the technology operates well and the content connects better with viewers; but those are fixable problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, an emerging concern based on the book publishing scenario is that \u2018more is not always better\u2019. If book publishers start pumping out a million books each, we, the reading public, will be inundated with books \u2013 many of which are likely to be poor quality, making it considerably more difficult to find the real gems in the sea of new publications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Having said this, it could be successfully argued that traditional book publishers have had way too much power over which authors get published. Numerous now-famous authors have shared stories about having their manuscripts rejected by well-known publishing houses before they finally got accepted, usually by a small, independent publisher. However, although there might be a case for greater equity, potentially being overwhelmed by poor-quality books is disconcerting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
AI travel influencers may be especially appealing to Caribbean countries, many of which count tourism among the largest contributors to their economy. Moreover, being able to stretch a country\u2019s marketing and promotion budgets further by leveraging AI could be quite compelling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, an important question that needs to be asked is, \u201cCould an AI help us to be unique?\u201d \u201cMore compelling?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One of the challenges with most of the publicly available AI platforms is that the advice or insights they tend to share are statistical norms or around the average, as was discussed in a recent ICT Pulse Podcast episode on whether you would let AI make all of your decisions<\/a>. Further, although to the individual user, the AI recommendation or AI-generated content may appear novel and insightful, if more people ask the same question, they are likely to receive similar answers \u2013 which, of course, will no longer seem unique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Image credit: kues1 (Freepik<\/a>)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n