This post examines crowdsourcing, its advantages and disadvantages, and suggests how it will change the world in years to come.<\/em><\/p>\n
Simply put, crowdsourcing is a means of outsourcing tasks that normally would be undertaken by a few persons (e.g. an employee), to a large group of people (a crowd). Persons are invited to participate through an open call or invitation, and those who have opted to participate typically establish online communities through which they create, collaborate, innovate, etc.<\/p>\n
Over time, crowdsourcing now typifies group-directed initiatives, which can be divided into four categories:<\/p>\n
It is important to highlight that to varying degrees, all of these forms of crowdsourcing are nothing new. For example, the student who is asking for sponsors to support him or her in walk, is no different from record amounts of money President Obama raised during the US presidential elections in 2008, through the contributions of his supporters. However now, crowdsourcing has been more fully conceptualised and is being leveraged in a variety of new and different ways.<\/p>\n
As expected, crowdsourcing has become widely popular, especially in organisations, where they are now able to access expertise and manpower easily, and in ways that might not have been permissible in the past. Further, people seem keen to participate in communities, which in turn has fuelled the use of crowdsourcing. Some additional advantages include:<\/p>\n
On the other hand, crowdsourcing gets roundly criticised on a broad range of fronts. Chiefly, it is seen as a form of exploitation \u2013 since it is often used to source cheap, even free, labour for someone else\u2019s gain.\u00a0 Additionally, there are concerns about the quality of the output produced by the community, due to the disparate group of people all collaborating on a matter. Further, there is rarely any formal agreement with community members, so matters related to confidentiality, terms of work, etc., are not discussed.<\/p>\n