Key findings from the Internet Society\u2019s Global Internet User Survey, which examined Internet usage, behaviour and attitudes, are highlighted and discussed.<\/em><\/p>\n
<\/a>The Internet Society<\/a> (ISOC) recently published the results of a survey<\/a> it conducted on Internet usage, behaviour and attitudes. The survey was administered to 10,789 Internet users in 20 countries, the majority of which are developed countries, and is considered \u201cone of the broadest surveys of Internet user attitudes on key issues facing the Internet<\/em>\u201d (Source: ISOC<\/a>).<\/p>\n
Whenever Internet users are polled on the Internet and human rights, there is generally wide consensus that the Internet should be considered a basic right, and that freedom of expression on the Internet should also be protected. This position is consistent with the findings of the ISOC survey, which stated:<\/p>\n
In our own discussion of the subject, Should Internet access be a basic right in the Caribbean?<\/a><\/em><\/strong>, we highlighted both the affirmative and negative of that question. Worldwide, there are a number of developed and developing countries, such as Finland, France, Mexico, Estonia, Chile, Greece and Nigeria, that have taken steps to establish Internet access as a basic right. Additionally, reference is regularly made to Article 19 of the United Nations\u2019 Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/a>, which ensures the right to \u201cto seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers\u201d. <\/em>Further, this position was corroborated by the <\/em>Human Rights Council of the United Nations in a 2011 report on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression<\/a>, which is of the view that disconnecting people from the Internet is a human rights violation and against international law.<\/p>\n
<\/a>Internet and censorship was a topic that we discussed in a recent post, What does the T&T Govt\/Google debacle tell us about the openness of the Internet?<\/a><\/em><\/strong> We noted, based on Google Transparency Reports<\/a>, that removal requests along the lines of undesirable behaviour\/activities, or societal protection, could inherently be a way for governments to censor information or freedom of expression.<\/p>\n
Protecting your privacy and identity online has been widely discussed, and we, at ICT Pulse, have published a number of articles on this issue. Generally, Internet users want to maintain some degree of anonymity and control over their content on the Internet, and there is usually considerable discontent when popular web properties, such as Facebook<\/a> or Google<\/a>, adjust their terms of use or privacy policies. However, the ISOC survey found:<\/p>\n
\n\n
- Even when users know they are sharing personal data with a site or service, most users (80 percent) do not always read privacy policies and a significant fraction (12 percent) of respondents admitted that they never read privacy policies.<\/em><\/li>\n
- Of users who logged into online services, only half reported that they logged out.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n
These results do suggest that although users might desire privacy, they are not prepared to be vigilant and to implement some basic practices.<\/p>\n
The Internet and economic and societal issues<\/h3>\n
The majority of Internet users surveyed (at least 60%) were of the view that the Internet could play a significant role in solving or improving:<\/p>\n
\n
- global problems, such as child mortality, maternal health and extreme poverty and hunger<\/li>\n
- global trade and economic relationships, education, and emergency response in natural disasters<\/li>\n
- business, science and technology.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Developing countries \u2013 many of which are facing economic and social challenges that might affect the extent to which they can satisfy the basic needs of their citizens \u2013 might generally be unwilling to reallocate what meagre resources they possess to improve the Internet access and use. Many of those countries rely on private sector (usually foreign direct) investment to develop their telecoms infrastructure, as they are unable to finance such projects. As a result, the countries might have limited control of the pace at which the networks are deployed, and to varying degrees the priority areas for access. Hence although the Internet could contribute significantly to some of the problems such countries are facing, it might not be the preferred route, when government funds must be allocated across a number of other (seemingly) more immediate imperatives.<\/p>\n
Attitudes towards the Internet<\/h3>\n
Finally, the Internet users surveyed responded overwhelmingly that \u201cthe Internet is essential for their access to knowledge and education\u201d, <\/em>and that <\/em>\u201cthe Internet plays a positive role for their individual lives as well as society at large<\/em>\u201d (Source: ISOC<\/a>). These views are consistent with some of the trends we have been observing within the Caribbean, such as the increased proliferation of smartphones and a growing number of Internet users. We also have a number of initiatives to increase Internet access and use, such as: the One Laptop Per Child\/One Laptop Per Student\/One Laptop Per Household projects, e-government strengthening strategies, along with efforts to integrate the Internet (ICT) at all school levels \u2013 not just as a subject to be taught, but to facilitate learning.<\/p>\n
Image credits: \u00a089studio<\/a> (FreeDigitalPhotos.net); \u00a0Ideas go<\/a> (FreeDigitalPhotos.net)<\/em><\/p>\n
__________________<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"