{"id":82773,"date":"2016-06-03T09:24:43","date_gmt":"2016-06-03T14:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ict-pulse.com\/?p=82773"},"modified":"2017-04-07T19:29:19","modified_gmt":"2017-04-08T00:29:19","slug":"4-takeaways-drama-yahoo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ict-pulse.com\/2016\/06\/4-takeaways-drama-yahoo\/","title":{"rendered":"4 takeaways from the drama that is Yahoo!"},"content":{"rendered":"
Yahoo! is regularly in the news as the business community for what seems to be a series of missteps by the firm. Here are four things we can learn from what has transpired to date<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n Founded in 1994, Yahoo! started as a search engine, but evolved to include a multitude of products and services, such as, a web portal, Yahoo Mail, Yahoo Messenger, Yahoo Sports, Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Music, Yahoo Movies, Yahoo Weather, Yahoo News, Yahoo Mobile and Yahoo Shopping, to name a few. From about 2008, the company started to struggle. It began to downsize considerably and also started to go through a string of Chief Executive Officers (CEOs).<\/span><\/p>\n Having said this, Yahoo! Is still very popular. It! is the highest-read news and media website, with over 6.6 billion readers per month, and as at May 2016, it was the fifth most visited website globally (Sources: <\/span>Alexa<\/span><\/a>; <\/span>SimilarWeb<\/span><\/a>). However, from all reports, the firm is floundering. While we will continue to see how the firm evolves, below are four things we can learn from what has transpired to date.<\/span><\/p>\n Since 2009, Yahoo! has had five CEOs – the latest and still current being former Google executive, Marissa Mayer. From most reports there appeared to have been some expectation that the CEOs would have implemented measures that almost immediately, would have considerably improved the fortune and prospects of the firm. However, unless one has a very nimble and lean organisation, and even under the best of circumstances, the results of whatever changes have been made, may take some time to yield results. Further, depending on the situation at hand, a single adjustment might not do the trick; and things may have to get worse before they get better.<\/span><\/p>\n Among its market experts and even its own management team, there has been a recognition that one of the reasons Yahoo! Has been floundering is that it was late appreciating the impact of mobile. While firms, such as Google, had their ears to the ground in the mid-2000s, and began to adjust their businesses to capitalise on the then imminent mobile wave, Yahoo! did not. Reportedly, it is only after Marissa Mayer took the helm in 2012 was there a decided strategic focus on mobile. However, most of Yahoo!\u2019s competitors would have had at least a four-year head start (Source: <\/span>Harvard Business Review<\/span><\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n This part of the Yahoo! story seems to mimic that of another firm: \u00a0BlackBerry. Regardless of the wave your business might be riding at a particular point in time, next big thing is always around the corner. In order to remain relevant and competitive, one cannot afford to be complacent.<\/span><\/p>\n At the best of times, and more so in the hotbed of innovation, Silicon Valley, firms can struggle to keep their staff, as firms tend to be always on the lookout for great talent. As a result, many take extra care to create a fun and salubrious workspace. Over the years, Yahoo! has had some massive staff layoffs,which no doubt, would demoralise the remaining employees, and foster a sense of uncertainty. <\/span><\/p>\n While Yahoo! might has bigger issues with respect to its longer term viability and strategic direction, the support and commitment of the team is crucial in realising that success.When morale is low, more often than not, employees might be more inclined to perform at the bare minimum, whilst being eager to consider other opportunities.<\/span><\/p>\n As indicated earlier and over the past few years, there have been numerous reports on the woes and misfortunes of Yahoo!. While we might ask ourselves how such a prominent firm could have lost its way so badly, we ought to remind ourselves that this did not happen overnight, but rather one bad decision at a time. <\/span><\/p>\n
\nFor anyone who follows tech developments outside of the Caribbean, the firm, Yahoo Inc. (Yahoo!), is regularly in the news. For most us, it has become a source of bewilderment and confusion, as it has moved from being one of the most progressive platforms and highly valued firms in the late 1990 and early 2000s, to one that has appeared to have lost it way and has no idea how to recover.<\/span><\/p>\n1. It cannot be quick wins all the time<\/span><\/h3>\n
2. It is crucial to be ahead of the curve <\/span><\/h3>\n
3. Unhappy staff can bring a business to its knees<\/span><\/h3>\n
4. \u00a0A firm seldom loses its way overnight<\/span><\/h3>\n