A brief examination of the state of Open Government in the Caribbean, based on the results of the latest global study, published by Open Knowledge International<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In this age, in which words like \u2018transparency\u2019 and \u2018accountability\u2019 \u2013 and more so the lack thereof \u2013 have resulted in the downfall of many companies and governments, there has been a concerted effort over the past 20 to 30 years for governments, in particular, to become more open. Although many governments have been making records available under freedom of information laws, technology and the digitisation of records have been making it easier to not only access, but also process, the sizeable datasets that governments tend to possess.. <\/span><\/p>\n
The Global Open Data Index (GODI) is an annual exercise, conducted by Open Knowledge International, to determine the extent to which countries worldwide have been publishing open government data. To be clear, \u201c<\/span>Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose<\/span><\/i>\u201d (Source: \u00a0<\/span>Open Definition<\/span><\/a>). \u00a0Hence this principle would be at odds with the proprietary posture many Caribbean government ministries, departments and agencies frequently adopt when asked to provide or share material that should (in fact) \u00a0be publicly available.<\/span><\/p>\n
For the 2016\/2017 GODI exercise, and according to the <\/span>Open Knowledge International website<\/span><\/a>, the openness of data for the following 15 categories was examined, each of which had to provide useful information to the public:<\/span><\/p>\n
Further, for each category, the data published ought to have specific properties, or characteristics, which the survey would need to confirm. For example, and in order for government budget data to qualify for assessment, it must be online and include the following:<\/p>\n
Additionally, it was also crucial for each dataset to be examined for openness, based on the Open Definition (see above) and the <\/span>Open Data Charter<\/span><\/a>. Thereafter, the results were tallied and countries awarded a score as a percentage to reflect the degree of openness of their government data. The higher the score, the more open and accessible government data is; the lower the score, the more difficult it is to access government data (see Exhibit 1).<\/span><\/p>\n
Exhibit 1: 2017 GODI scoring spectrum (Source: Open Knowledge International)<\/p><\/div>\n
In the 2016\/2017 GODI exercise, 94 countries worldwide were assessed, including 10 Caribbean countries: Antigua and Barbuda; the Bahamas; Barbados; Dominican Republic; Guyana; Jamaica; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; and Trinidad and Tobago. However, in the previous year, Dominica and Grenada had been included, and the exercise covered 122 countries.<\/span><\/p>\n
Exhibit 2: 2016 GODI scores for select Caribbean countries (Source: Open Knowledge International)<\/p><\/div>\n
data in the Caribbean is still poor: ranging from a score of just 5% in Antigua and Barbuda, to 27% in the Dominican Republic. \u00a0Although according to the scoring spectrum (Exhibit 1), scores up to 85% point to data that might be be open, but \u201c<\/span>with the limitation that users have to register online for download<\/span><\/i>\u201d (Source: <\/span>Open Knowledge International<\/span><\/a>), the low scores in the region suggest considerable strictures still exist.<\/span><\/p>\n